Global model laboratory · customer records excluded
Model Leaderboard
Choose one game and jurisdiction. Every row comes from a candidate locked before that exact official occurrence. Historical backtests, customer plays, and shared-game results from the other jurisdiction are not mixed into this forward record.
New York
Money Dots model standings
311 completed pre-draw fields graded per model.
| Model | Fields graded | Exact hits | Pattern hits | Average pattern match | Average main matches | Bonus hit rate | Score vs random control | Prize-bearing fields |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All-draw frequency | 311 | 6 · 1.9% | — | — | 0.019 | — | +0.0129 | 6 · 1.9% |
| Balanced draw model | 311 | 5 · 1.6% | — | — | 0.016 | — | +0.0097 | 5 · 1.6% |
| Same-draw frequency | 311 | 4 · 1.3% | — | — | 0.013 | — | +0.0065 | 4 · 1.3% |
| Uniform control Control | 311 | 2 · 0.6% | — | — | 0.006 | — | 0.0 | 2 · 0.6% |
| Recent momentum | 311 | 2 · 0.6% | — | — | 0.006 | — | 0.0 | 2 · 0.6% |
| Draw-shape transition research Comparison model | 184 | 2 · 1.1% | 9 | 62.9% | 0.011 | — | +0.0045 | 2 · 1.1% |
How to read this: average matches measures partial field quality; exact hits remain the strict full-result measure. Pattern hits require the complete pre-declared shape to match; average pattern match gives partial structural credit without counting it as a number win. “Score vs random control” compares each strategy with the uniform-control model on the same locked sample. A positive value is evidence to investigate, not proof of an edge, and it never changes the official odds.